Hello,
After learning more about tone, I got curious and after reading Bamadaba’s explanation on tonal notation, I was wondering if there are first, some words morphemes like suffixes that do not have tone, and second, if morphemes affect the tone of a word when used or do they have no impact.
Thanks,
Malik
Hi Malik!
I’m not 100% sure what you mean by “words morphemes like suffixes”. I am going to assume that your question is about suffixes/prefixes.
I think that the short answer to your question is that suffixes (e.g., -li
, -ya
, -la
, -baga
, etc.) do not have their own underlying tones:
Instead, they come to carry a tone that is defined by the headword to which they are attached as well as the context of the broader word. For instance:
fàràlí ̀
‘act of adding’
VS
fàràlìbá ̀
‘big act of adding’
Verbal prefixes (such as, lá-
, mà-
, and sɔ̀-
), on the other hand, carry a tone that is independent from the verb to which they are attached. For instance:
Ka mɔgɔ lájɛ́
(
lajɛ
<lá-
‘causative prefix’ +jɛ́
‘whiten’)‘to scrutinize/look at people’
VS
ka mɔgɔ lájɛ̀
(
lájɛ̀
<lá-
‘causative prefix’ +jɛ̀
‘unite; gather; assemble’)'to unite people
Notice how in the second example, the tone of lá- did not “overtake” that of jɛ̀.
(Note though that when these verbs with prefixes are used as nouns, they become “tonally compact”; meaning that the tone of the prefix overtakes/defines that of the verb.)
One last thing: keep in mind that this is not an explanation of “Bambara tonal notation” – it is just an explanation of their system of conventions for marking tone.
There is not one standard for writing Bambara/Manding tone in Latin script.